Table of Contents  

Present standards and future concepts of surgery in breast cancer

Todd M Tuttle, Natasha M Rueth
Published in : HAMDAN MEDICAL JOURNAL ; Vol 5, No 1 (2012)
DOI : 10.7707/hmj.v5i1.105

Abstract


Not so long ago, most breast cancer patients were treated with mastectomy (without reconstruction) and routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). With the increased emphasis on minimally invasive and less morbid surgical procedures, most patients today undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS)without ALND. The surgical options for patients who require or desire mastectomy have dramatically expanded with the development of skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies and better access to reconstructive options. Surprisingly, an increasing proportion of patients with unilateral breast cancer are undergoing bilateral mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Today, surgeons are more involved in the delivery of partial breast irradiation therapy with the development of balloon-catheter brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. As a result of new technologies, improved surgical techniques and practice-changing studies, the surgeons’ role in breast cancer treatment has become increasingly more complex. The purpose of this review article is to outline the rapidly changing landscape of breast cancer management and to highlight the surgeons’ role in this multifaceted disease.

 


View article in  :   HTML     PDF     Flip

References


Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, et al. Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: an overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:3129–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1914-x

Abbott AM, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the use of implantable accelerated partial breast irradiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United States. Cancer 2011; 117:3305–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25927

Akashi-Tanaka S, Shimizu C, Ando M, et al. 21-Gene expression profile assay on core needle biopsies predicts responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast 2009; 18:171–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.03.005

Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 1996; 276:1818–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540220042028

Altschuler A, Nekhlyudov L, Rolnick SJ, et al. Positive, negative, and disparate--women’s differing long-term psychosocial experiences of bilateral or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast J 2008; 14:25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00521.x

Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:145–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01765-1

Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:1558–64.

Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:2697–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z

Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ, et al. What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17:558–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0765-1

Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:332–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3207

Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003; 98:468–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11490

Benitez PR, Keisch ME, Vicini F, et al. Five-year results: the initial clinical trial of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. Am J Surg 2007; 194:456–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.010

Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 2007; 142:441–5; discussion 445–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.5.441

Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, et al. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209:608–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.026

Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209:180–7; quiz 294–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010

Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212:686–93; discussion 693–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.039

Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5640–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5756

Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH, et al. The use of skin sparing mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer: the Emory experience. Surg Oncol 2003; 12:265–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2003.09.002

Chao KK, Vicini FA, Wallace M, et al. Analysis of treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity using the MammoSite breast brachytherapy catheter to deliver accelerated partial-breast irradiation: the William Beaumont Hospital experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69:32–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.026

Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, et al. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 2003; 237:26–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00005

Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, et al. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammoplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumours. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:363–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199508000-00015

Cote RJ, Peterson HF, Chaiwun B, et al. Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Lancet 1999; 354:896–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11104-2

Cox CE, Kiluk JV, Riker AI, et al. Significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastases in human breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:261–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.024

Crowe JP, Jr., Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004; 139:148–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148

de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:3117–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y

Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Quinn CM, et al. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. J Surg Oncol 2006; 93:559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.20445

Downes KJ, Glatt BS, Kanchwala SK, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 103:906–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20851

Dunne C, Burke JP, Morrow M, Kell MR. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1615–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5182

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1444–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199511303332202

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152

Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:665–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198503143121101

Foote RL, Johnson RE, Donohue JH, et al. Trends in surgical treatment of breast cancer at Mayo Clinic 1980–2004. Breast 2008; 17:555–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2008.08.007

Freedman RA, He Y, Winer EP, Keating NL. Trends in racial and age disparities in definitive local therapy of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:713–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9234

Friese CR, Neville BA, Edge SB, et al. Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results –Medicare data. Cancer 2009; 115:716–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24085

Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers TA, et al. Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA 2000; 284:319–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.3.319

Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63:332–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.014

Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS, 3rd, Disa JJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J 2009; 15:440–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00758.x

Geiger AM, Nekhlyudov L, Herrinton LJ, et al. Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:686–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9206-6

Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–8; discussion 398–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015

Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010; 252:426–32; discussion 432–3.

Giuliano AE, Hawes D, Ballman KV, et al. Association of occult metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow with survival among women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. JAMA 2011; 306:385–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1034

Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011; 305:569–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.90

Goyal A, Douglas-Jones A, Monypenny I, et al. Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ?: analysis of 587 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 98:311–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9167-2

Greenway RM, Schlossberg L, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg 2005; 190(6):918–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.035

Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3437–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6774

Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46:3219–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.043

Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:3248–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108

Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59:290–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20028

Hulvat M, Sandalow N, Rademaker A, et al. Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging. Surgery 2010; 148:746–50; discussion 750–1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.012

Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218:497–502.

Jin Kim H, Heerdt AS, Cody HS, Van Zee KJ. Sentinel lymph node drainage in multicentric breast cancers. Breast J 2002; 8:356–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08605.x

Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:2691–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0547-9

Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:4082–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225

Kim HJ, Lee JS, Park EH, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in patients with multiple breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 109:503–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9674-9

Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomized phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8:881–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4

Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993; 2:335–9; discussion 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-7404(93)90064-6

Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:609–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z

Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 86:628–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<628::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-L

Lee CH, Carter D, Philpotts LE, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted? Radiology 2000; 217:466–70.

Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa065447

Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:901–10.

Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:3657–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062

Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2694–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.188

Masetti R, Pirulli PG, Magno S, et al. Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2000; 7:276–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02966389

McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:2682–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0635-x

McLaughlin CC, Lillquist PP, Edge SB. Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 through 2005. Cancer 2009; 115:5404–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24623

McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C, et al. Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg 2001; 234:292–9; discussion 299–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200109000-00003

Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, et al. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1093–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6078

Miller BT, Abbott AM, Tuttle TM. The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2011.

Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:546–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0542-1

Morrow M. Breast conservation and negative margins: how much is enough? Breast 2009; 18(Suppl 3):S84–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(09)70279-6

Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Montag E, et al. Outcome analysis of immediate and delayed conservative breast surgery reconstruction with mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty techniques. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67:220–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181f77bba

National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (http://www.nccn.org). 2011.

Nelson JC, Beitsch PD, Vicini FA, et al. Four-year clinical update from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite brachytherapy trial. Am J Surg 2009; 198:83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.016

NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 1991; 265:391–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03460030097037

Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:167–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01268-1

Roughton MC, Shenaq D, Jaskowiak N, et al. Optimizing delivery of breast conservation therapy: a multidisciplinary approach to oncoplastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203:704–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015

Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple–areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 1989; 158:399–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90272-9

Shapiro-Wright HM, Julian TB. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of the axilla in ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010; 2010:145–9.

Shen J, Ellenhorn J, Qian D, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: a survey based approach to defining standard of care. Am Surg 2008; 74:902–5.

Silverstein MJ. How I do it: oncoplastic breast-conservation surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(Suppl 3):242–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1240-8

Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184:383–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01012-7

Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1597–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0362-3

Tafra L, Lannin DR, Swanson MS, et al. Multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer using both technetium sulfur colloid and isosulfan blue dye. Ann Surg 2001; 233:51–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200101000-00009

Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375:563–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5

Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend towards more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:5203–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141

Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Virnig BA, Kane RL. The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging on important outcomes among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2010 41:117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq023

Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1362–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681

Tuttle TM, Zogakis TG, Dunst CM, et al. A review of technical aspects of sentinel lymph node identification for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:261–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01225-5

Tuttle TM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy. Preferred method of axillary staging for breast cancer. Minerva Ginecol 2005; 57:293–303.

Tuttle TM. Technical advances in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am Surg 2004; 70:407–13.

Vaidya JS, Joseph DJ, Tobias JS, et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet; 376:91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60837-9

Vaughan A, Dietz JR, Aft R, et al. Scientific Presentation Award. Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2007; 194:438–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.011

Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:546–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012782

Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:6–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198107023050102

Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 2010; 251:595–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e92a

Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple–areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN, et al. Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:412–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008108

Woerdeman LA, Hage JJ, Smeulders MJ, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by use of implants: an assessment of risk factors for complications and cancer control in 120 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:321–30; discussion 331–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000234049.91710.ba

Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI, et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ.J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:516–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.11.012

Yueh JH, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62:586–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819fb1ac



Comments on this article



View all comments  |  Add comment 





Home  Editorial Board  Search  Current Issue  Archive Issues  Announcements  Aims & Scope  About the Journal  How to Submit  Contact Us
Find out how to become a part of the HMJ  |   CLICK HERE >>
© Copyright 2012 - 2013 HMJ - HAMDAN Medical Journal. All Rights Reserved         Website Developed By Cedar Solutions INDIA