|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 163-167
The psychobiology and management of chronic pain
Shibu Sasidharan1, Harpreet Singh Dhillon2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India
|Date of Submission||20-Jul-2021|
|Date of Decision||29-Jul-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||02-Sep-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Jan-2022|
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Chandimandir
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: The objective of this review is to advance our understanding on the biolecial and psychological perspectives of Chronic Pain. Methods: For research, a PubMed search was conducted on 01.05.2021 using the systematic review filter to identify articles that were published using MeSH terms Chronic Pain, Pain, Psychology of Pain. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses were selected from a systematic search for literature containing diagnostic, prognostic and management strategies in MEDLINE/PubMed. Results: Depression is more common in chronic pain patients (CPPs) than in healthy controls as a consequence of the presence of CP. At pain onset, predisposition to depression (the scar hypothesis) may increase the likelihood for the development of depression in some CPPs. Because of difficulties in measuring depression in the presence of CP, the reviewed studies should be interpreted with caution. Little attention, however, has been given to the development of a comprehensive model that integrates both biomedical and psychological variables in the etiology, maintenance, and exacerbation of chronic pain. The purpose of this article is to propose a dynamic psychobiological model of chronic pain that emphasizes the interaction among psychological and biomedical variables. The experience of pain is viewed as a complex response that incorporates subjective-psychological, motor-behavioral, and physiological-organic components. Moreover, we postulate that there are varying degrees of synchrony among responses measured on these levels determining the development and etiology of chronic pain syndromes.
Keywords: ACT, Coping, Opioid, Cognitive behavioural therapy, Somatic Anchoring
|How to cite this article:|
Sasidharan S, Dhillon HS. The psychobiology and management of chronic pain. Hamdan Med J 2021;14:163-7
| Introduction|| |
Chronic pain is an emotional experience with humanitarian dimensions and is defined as pain lasting greater than six months. It is important to understand the neurophysiology of pain in order to treat it. Nociceptors in the periphery travel to the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal cord while secondary and tertiary afferents transmit information from the dorsal horn to the brain. Modification of pain information may take place in these ascending pathways or in descending pathways. Treatment of chronic pain is most successful when it is approached in a multidisciplinary fashion with the focus not only on treatment of underlying etiology, but also on the secondary impacts of pain on the patient's life. The management of chronic pain requires special expertise. Most of the experts in chronic pain assessment and management organize themselves into pain treatment centers. These centers vary widely in their approach to the problem. The most sophisticated is a multidisciplinary center that is university-based and includes teaching and research.
Chronic pain (CP) has a significant debilitating impact on an individual's life. Pain is labelled chronic when it persists for more than 3 months and has significant emotional distress and functional disability. CP is a highly prevalent condition, with an estimated 20% of the worldwide population suffering from it, and is responsible for 15% to 20% of visits to the physician., In an international survey (18 countries, 42,249 respondents), the 12-month prevalence of CP was 37% in developed countries and 41% in developing countries. CP has a significantly negative impact on psychological state, physical health and social functioning. Since CP is a complex medical condition, it requires a broad array of healthcare professionals for optimum management. 'Active self-management' is a crucial factor, along with targeted psycho-social and medical support.
In an attempt to systematically classify, CP has been coded into the international classification of diseases (ICD), 11th revision as chronic primary pain, widespread chronic pain, chronic primary visceral pain, chronic primary musculoskeletal pain, chronic primary headache or orofacial pain and complex regional pain syndrome.
Historically, pain was viewed as a medical symptom, which should respond to physical treatment (pharmacological, surgical management). However, due to inadequate response to conventional treatments, a shift in perspective and biopsychosocial effect and cause model were proposed. The experience of CP is designed by a multitude of biological, psycho-social (e.g., patients' beliefs, affective state, expectations) and behavioural factors (e.g., circumstances, the behaviour of significant others). CP impacts all ages and socio-demographic groups in a multi-dimensional manner, and hence, management of CP entails a multi-disciplinary approach., In this article, the authors have tried to understand the magnitude, psychology, implications and management of CP, emphasising cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT).
| Psychology of Chronic Pain|| |
Various psychological models have been applied to advance our understanding of causation, perpetuation and management of CP.
The operant model advocates that the frequency of any behaviour is contingent upon the response that it elicits from the environment. A favourable response (affection, sympathy, support, sanctioned time out) increases the frequency of particular behaviours, while unfavourable (neglect/aversion/punishment) responses reduce the frequency. Pain behaviours tend to sustain or even increase in frequency when they elicit favourable responses. However, if such favourable responses are substituted with alternate behaviours (or better known as 'well behaviours'), it can lead to a reduction in the frequency of pain behaviours. These 'well behavior' includes graded physical exercise, active lifestyle, activity tolerance, focus on self-efficacy and independent functioning despite chronic pain. On the other hand, maladaptive pain behaviours contribute to the maintenance of pain and prolonged disability. Hence, management of CP as per the operant model involves identifying factors that precipitate, perpetuate and relieve pain with the final aim to reduce the reinforcing behaviours and boost the 'well behaviours'. It involves educating the patient and significant others to identify and practice the well behaviours while ignoring the reinforcing behaviours.
The peripheral muscle relaxation-training model with the help of biofeedback was initially advocated for the treatment of stress and anxiety disorders. However, certain CP conditions (chronic low backache, tension-type headache) are also attributable to persistent and excessive muscle tension. Hence, it is worthwhile to educate CP patients to regulate their autonomic nervous system through relaxation training and biofeedback. Relaxation training coupled with biofeedback thus forms an essential component of multi-disciplinary CP management.
The cognitive and coping model argues that the pain behaviours of an individual can be better predicted and influenced when his cognitions (beliefs, motivation, attribution, intentions, etc.) are taken into account. Thus, during the management of CP, patients are educated to become more aware of their thoughts accompanying the pain, maintain a log and identify the adaptive/maladaptive thoughts based on their overall helpfulness/unhelpfulness. They are then instructed to focus and strengthen the adaptive thoughts and avoid/ignore the unhelpful ones. There is extensive literature supporting CBT efficacy in reducing CP and improving overall physical and psychological function.
| Assessment|| |
An inherent problem in assessing pain is that there are currently no objective measures to determine/validate the extent of an individual's pain except the subjective self-reporting by the patient. However, CP affects not only the patient but also the significant others (partners, friends, relatives, employers and co-workers) around him and thus necessitates evaluating a comprehensive biopsychosocial profile of the patient, including physical, psychological and financial implications. The healthcare providers need to conduct a thorough clinical examination and diagnostic investigations to locate any biological aetiology of pain while concurrently assessing the patient's cognitions and coping, emotional impact and dysregulation, expectations, responses of significant others (caregiver burden) and functional as well as financial disability.
The psycho-social and behavioural factors can be screened with the acronym 'ACT-UP' (activity, coping, think, upset and people's responses) to guide a brief screening interview for clinicians. This can be summarised as follows:
- Activities: How is your pain affecting your life (i.e., sleep, appetite, physical activities and relationships)?
- Coping: How do you deal/cope with your pain (what makes it better/worse)?
- Think: Do you think your pain will ever get better?
- Upset: Have you felt worried (anxious)/depressed (down, blue)?
- People: How do people respond when you have pain?
The standardised CP assessment tools available to assess the sensory and affective qualities of CP are Numerical Rating Scales; Visual Analogue Scales; Faces Scale; Verbal Descriptor Scales; Brief Pain Inventory; Graded Chronic Pain Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire; Pain Detect; Neuropathic Pain Scale; Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory; Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs and Douleur Neuropathique-4 Questions. These are easy to use in routine clinical settings.
| Implications of Chronic Pain|| |
CP has a significant association with psychological states and psychiatric disorders. CP poses a greater risk for having depression, and also up to 75% of depressed patients reports CP. The incidence of depression amongst patients with CP is estimated to be 30%–45% compared to 5%–7% in the general population. Furthermore, depressed patients with CP report worse sleep disturbances, fatigue, psychomotor retardation, impaired concentration and poor quality of life than people without CP. Moreover, depressed patients with CP respond poorly to antidepressant therapy.
There has been an increase in the use of opioids to manage chronic and acute pain because the effect of opioids tends to wear off following prolonged use, necessitating increased dosages. There has been a 198% increase in hydrocodone prescriptions, a 588% increase in oxycodone prescriptions and a 933% increase in methadone prescriptions from 1997 to 2005. More than 10 million Americans aged more than 12 years were using opioid analgesics without medical prescription in 2014. Although opioids are effective for short-term management of acute and cancer pain, the evidence for long-term management of chronic non-cancer pain is lacking., Second, unregulated long-term use amplifies the risk of addiction and severe side effects. Moreover, patients with existing psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety, depression) tend to experience higher pain intensity, thus demanding higher doses of opioids and an increased likelihood of developing opioid dependence.
| Management|| |
The World Health Organization for Cancer Pain recommends a “three-step analgesic ladder” approach for pain medication so that medications with the fewest side effects and the least addicting potential are prescribed first. We believe this approach is appropriate for medical management of noncancer pain as well. While many physicians may question the use of opioids for noncancer pain, current opinion favors this consideration on an individual basis. Additional medication is added to the first step of the ladder as needed. Non-opioid analgesics, such as the non-steroidal agents and acetaminophen, are useful agents to treat acute and chronic pain. They are nonaddictive, have a ceiling analgesic effect (more drug does not offer improved benefit), and are antipyretic. Except for acetaminophen, they are believed to act in the peripheral nervous system by preventing the formation of prostaglandins. They may be administered orally, rectally, or intravenously. Long-term administration does have recognizable toxicity. Renal and hepatic injury should be assessed with regular monitoring every six months. Centrally acting agents, such as the weak opioids, should be considered next if the non-opioid therapies are not adequate. Weak opioids, such as hydrocodone, codeine, and propoxyphene, work at the mu receptors. Many of these opioids are administered in compound formulations with acetaminophen, which limits their dosing, secondary to the risk of liver toxicity from the acetaminophen (greater than 4 g per day). If weak opioids are not effective, or the required dose exceeds that allowable with the acetaminophen, a change to a stronger opioid (morphine, methadone, or dilaudid) is appropriate. The opioids can be delivered intravenously, orally, transdermally, or rectally; it is cheaper and easier, however, to administer opioids orally. All of the opioids work at the mu receptor, and they all have the same side-effect profile, including the risk of respiratory depression, pruritis, nausea, and constipation. Side effects usually decrease with use, except for constipation. A bowel regimen is always indicated for patients on chronic or short-term opioids. Organ-system toxicity with chronic opioid use is not described. Concern over physical and psychological dependence, as well as tolerance and withdrawal, warrant careful consideration. Our recommendation would be to prescribe potent opioids with the intent to achieve specific (not general) goals that can be measured (i.e. walk a certain distance each day, go to work each day, decrease emergency room visits). Epidural and intrathecal opiates can be offered to patients who escalate their opiates to levels that cause respiratory depression and sedation while seeking pain relief. The non-pharmacological interventions include acupuncture, tai chi, reiki, prayer, graded physical exercise, CBT, magnetic stimulation, relaxation training, biofeedback and mindfulness-based stress reduction.They are classified as complementary alternative medical therapies.
CBT has been primarily utilised in psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder; however, it is effective in patients with CP. The principle behind CBT is to identify and change thought patterns accompanying maladaptive behaviours into adaptive ones. The success of CBT techniques in the management of CP is attributable to its ability to alter brain function and connections in nociceptive and non-nociceptive areas of the brain, reduction in posterior cingulate cortex activity, pain-related cognition and anxiety related to pain. Multiple randomised controlled trials demonstrate that CBT successfully improves CP across a broad spectrum of syndromes, including headaches, arthritis, cancer and fibromyalgia. The various CBT techniques available for CP are summarised [Table 1].
The impact of positive psychological factors (individual adjustment to persistent pain, pain acceptance, hope and optimism) has been studied in patients with CP. Hope has been associated with reduced chronic pain, functional disability, psychological distress and physical weakening in multiple sclerosis and cancer patients., Acceptance-based behavioural interventions recommend engaging in meaningful activities despite the pain and has been shown to significantly lower pain levels, pain-associated distress and disability.
Occupational therapists, through their partaking in everyday activities, can assist patients in their well-being. Nutritionists can educate patients about the role of food and its effect in regulating chronic inflammation. Therapies based on naturopathic nutrition and diet are widely being researched. They can also give suggestions on effective weight management. Social workers can assist by advising patients about available public health services, healthcare plans and benefits of each. They can also help improve the practice and ethical standards of the multi-disciplinary team approach.
| Recommendations|| |
- More training: Clinicians, including (but not limited to) those working in primary care, may lack sufficient teaching and training about the treatment and management of chronic pain. This lack of good teaching and training can result in poor treatment choices. Coding CP into ICD-11 has allowed us to devise uniform treatment guidelines. In addition, the primary assessment, evaluation and management of CP should be included in the basic medical education teaching curricula
- Expand management team framework. Include psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, nutritionists and occupational therapists in the treatment of chronic pain
- Extending follow-up periods. Chronic pain, in many cases, is a prolonged disability. This protracted agony can cause psychological, behavioural and financial repercussions. Hence, a long-term follow-up is suggested to track these changes
- Relaxation Techniques: Techniques customised to help the patient to relax both mentally and physically are effective in CP. While mental relaxation eases mental stress, physical relaxation techniques can ease the tense muscles consequent from pain
- Somatic anchoring (SA): SA has been found useful in somatic, visceral and neuropathic pain. It involves cognitive restructuring and mindfulness meditation as a tool in cases where medications have been ineffective
- Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): Mindfulness, along with ACT, is a branch of CBT. It focuses on training the individual on accepting the things that are out of one's control and committing to psychological interventions targeted at improving the quality of one's life.
| Conclusion|| |
Chronic pain is a significant public health problem with massive health resources and suboptimal outcomes. Psycho-social factors and biological factors play a significant role in patients with chronic pain; therefore, therapeutic interventions must include psychological therapies, especially CBT. CBT, SA and ACT are effective in alleviating chronic pain across a broad spectrum of chronic pain syndromes.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JW, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Benoliel R, et al.
The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: Chronic primary pain. Pain 2019;160:28-37.
Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health 2011;11:770.
Koleva D. Paininprimarycare: An Italian survey. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:475-79.
Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, et al.
Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: Gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain 2008;9:883-91.
van den Berg-Emons RJ, Schasfoort FC, de Vos LA, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Impact of chronic pain on everyday physical activity. Eur J Pain 2007;11:587-93.
Smith BH, Fors EA, Korwisi B, Barke A, Cameron P, Colvin L, et al.
The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: Applicability in primary care. Pain 2019;160:83-7.
Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet 2011;377:2226-35.
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287-333.
Carter JJ, Watson AC, Sminkey PV. Pain management: Screening and assessment of pain as part of a comprehensive case management process. Prof Case Manag 2014;19:126-34.
Flor H, Turk DC. Chronic Pain: An Integrated Biobehavioral Perspective. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2011.
Buenaver LF, Campbell CM, Haythornthwaite JA. Cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic pain. In: Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JP, editors. 'Bonica's Management of Pain. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2010. p. 1220-30.
Sasidharan S, Dhillon GK, Dhillon HS, Manalikuzhiyil B. Scales for assessment of pain in infants, neonates and children. Advances in Human Biology 2021;11:285.
Turk DC, Robinson JP. Assessment of patients with chronic pain – A comprehensive approach. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editors. Handbook of Pain Assessment. 3rd
ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 188-210.
Fillingim RB, Loeser JD, Baron R, Edwards RR. Assessment of Chronic Pain: Domains, Methods, and Mechanisms. J Pain 2016;17:T10-20.
Agüera-Ortiz L, Failde I, Mico JA, Cervilla J, López-Ibor JJ. Pain as a symptom of depression: Prevalence and clinical correlates in patients attending psychiatric clinics. J Affect Disord 2011;130:106-12.
Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Lee S, Posada-Villa J, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, et al.
Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: Results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Pain 2007;129:332-42.
Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Eckert GJ, Stang PE, Croghan TW, Kroenke K. Impact of pain on depression treatment response in primary care. Psychosom Med 2004;66:17-22.
Manchikanti L. National drug control policy and prescription drug abuse: Facts and fallacies. Pain Physician 2007;10:399-424.
Pezalla EJ, Rosen D, Erensen JG, Haddox JD, Mayne TJ. Secular trends in opioid prescribing in the USA. J Pain Res 2017;10:383-7.
Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Adler JA, Ballantyne JC, Davies P, et al.
Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain 2009;10:113-30.
Chaparro LE, Furlan AD, Deshpande A, Mailis-Gagnon A, Atlas S, Turk DC. Opioids compared to placebo or other treatments for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8:CD004959.
Börsbo B, Peolsson M, Gerdle B. The complex interplay between pain intensity, depression, anxiety and catastrophising with respect to quality of life and disability. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1605-13.
Wylde V, Dennis J, Beswick AD, Bruce J, Eccleston C, Howells N, et al.
Systematic review of management of chronic pain after surgery. Br J Surg 2017;104:1293-306.
Nascimento SS, Oliveira LR, DeSantana JM. Correlations between brain changes and pain management after cognitive and meditative therapies: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Complement Ther Med 2018;39:137-45.
Urits I, Hubble A, Peterson E, Orhurhu V, Ernst CA, Kaye AD, et al.
An update on cognitive therapy for the management of chronic pain: A comprehensive review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019;23:57.
Berendes D, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Kothadia SM, Porter LS, Cheavens JS. Hope in the context of lung cancer: Relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:174-82.
Sasidharan S, Singh V, Singh J, Madan GS, Dhillon HS, Dash PK, et al.
COVID-19 ARDS: A Multispecialty Assessment of Challenges in Care, Review of Research, and Recommendations. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacolog 2021;37:179.
Viane I, Crombez 'G, Eccleston C, Poppe C, Devulder J, Van Houdenhove B, et al.
Acceptance of pain is an independent predictor of mental well-being in patients with chronic pain: Empirical evidence and reappraisal. Pain 2003;106:65-72.
Schneiderhan J, Clauw D, Schwenk TL. Primary care of patients with chronic pain. JAMA 2017;317:2367-8.